Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Cognitive Assessment Interview versi Indonesia

Authors

  • Wikan Ardiningrum Psikiater, RS Jiwa Grhasia, Sleman, DI. Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Carla Raymondalexas Marchira Psikiater, Konsultan Psikiatri Komunitas, Departemen Ilmu Kedokteran Jiwa Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat, dan Keperawatan Universitas Gadjah Mada/RSUP Dr Sardjito, DI Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Cecep Sugeng Kristanto Psikiater, Konsultan Psikiatri Biologi, Departemen Ilmu Kedokteran Jiwa Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat, dan Keperawatan Universitas Gadjah Mada/RSUP Dr Sardjito,DI Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Silas Henry Ismanto Psikiater, Departemen Ilmu Kedokteran Jiwa Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat, dan Keperawatan Universitas Gadjah Mada/RSUP Dr Sardjito, DI Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Seviana Primawati Dokter Umum, RS Jiwa Grhasia, DI Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55175/cdk.v46i5.458

Keywords:

CAI, Indonesia, reliabilitas, skizofrenia, validitas

Abstract

Introduksi. Defisit kognitif merupakan prediktor konsisten disabilitas pasien skizofrenia. Salah satu instrumen penilaian fungsi kognitif pasien skizofrenia adalah Cognitive Assessment Interview. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menguji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen Cognitive Assessment Interview versi Bahasa Indonesia (CAI-Ina). Metode. Uji validitas dan reliabilitas meliputi uji validitas isi, uji validitas konstruk, uji reliabilitas interrater, dan uji reliabilitas konsistensi internal. Pengambilan data dilakukan satu kali pada 112 pasien skizofrenia dan informan di klinik rawat jalan psikiatri RS Jiwa Grhasia DIY. Analisis data menggunakan SPSS 16. Hasil. Hasil kajian ulang, penerjemahan, dan terjemahan balik CAI-Ina oleh pakar telah disetujui oleh Ventura sebagai penyusun instrumen asli. Semua item dalam instrumen CAI-Ina memiliki korelasi sedang-kuat dengan skor total CAI-Ina (r=0,568-0,720; p<0,001). Terdapat korelasi sangat kuat antara skor total penilai, pasien, dan informan (r=0,903-0,944; p<0,001). Analisis faktor mendapatkan dua komponen utama, yaitu komponen terkait memori dan tidak terkait memori yang keduanya dapat menjelaskan 58,6% keseluruhan konstruk instrumen CAI-Ina. Nilai Cronbach’s alpha pasien 0,789; informan 0,835; dan penilai 0,850. Hasil uji interrater koefisien Kappa seluruh item dan skor total 0,722-0,939 dan koefisien konkordansi Kendall W 0,834-0,985. Skor CAI-Ina memiliki korelasi kuat dengan skor GAF (r=-0,722-(-)0,808; p<0,001) ataupun kemampuan fungsi sosial (r=-0,684-(-)0,750; p<0,001). CAI-Ina memiliki validitas isi dan konstruk yang baik serta reliabilitas yang tinggi.

Introduction. Cognitive deficit is a consistent predictor for disabilities in patient with schizophrenia. One instrument that can be used to assess cognitive deficit in schizophrenia is Cognitive Assessment Interview. This study will evaluate the validity and reliability of CAI instrument in Indonesia languange version (CAI-Ina). Method. The validity and reliability evaluation includes content validity, construct validity, inter rater reliability, and internal consistency reliability. Data was collected one time from 112 patients and informants in the outpatient clinic in Grhasia Mental Hospital DIY. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 16. Result. Reassessment result, translation and back translation by an expert have been approved by Ventura as the original author. All items in the CAI have medium-strong correlation with the total score of CAI-Ina (r=0.568-0.720; p<0.001). There was a very strong correlation among the total score of the raters, patients, and informants (r=0.903-0.944; p<0.001). The two major components : memory related components and non-memory related components can explain 58.6% total instrument construct in the CAI-Ina. Cronbach’s alpha of patients was 0.789; of informants was 0.835; and of rater was 0.850. Kappa coefficients of all items and the total scores were 0.722- 0.939. The Kendall W concordance coefficients were 0.834 – 0.985. Score of CAI-Ina have a strong correlation with GAF score (r=-0.722-(-)0.808; p<0.001) and social functioning (r=-0.684-(-)0.750; p<0.001). CAI-Ina has a good content and constructs validity, also has a high reliability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

WHO. Schizophrenia [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2014 July 1]. Available from: www.who.int

Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan. Hasil utama Riskesdas 2018. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. 2018.

WHO. The global burden of disease 2004 update [Internet]. 2008. Available from: https://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GBD_report_2004update_full.pdf

Harvey PD, Strassnig, M. Predicting the severity of everyday functional disability in people with schizophrenia: Cognitive deficits, functional capacity, symptoms, and health status. World Psychiatr. 2012;11:73-9

Ventura J, Hellemann GS, Thames AD, Koellner V, Nuechterlein KH. Symptoms as mediators of the relationship between neurocognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Res. 2009;113:189–99.

Shamsi S, Lau A, Lencz T, Burdick KE, deRosse P, Brenner R. et al. Cognitive and symptomatic predictors of functional disability in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Res. 2011;126:257-64

Bowie CR, Harvey PD. Cognitive deficits and functional outcome in schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treatment. 2006;2(4):531-6

Reichenberg A, Harvey PD, Bowie CR, Mojtabai R, Rabinowitz J, Heaton RK, et al. Neuropsychological function and dysfunction in schizophrenia and psychotic affective disorders. Schizophrenia Bull. 2009;35(5):1022–9

Keefe RSE, Harvey PD. Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. In: Geyer MA, Gross G. (eds.), 2012. Novel antischizophrenia treatments. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg; 2012. p. 11-37.

Bakkour N, Samp J, Akhras K, Hammi E, Soussi I, Zahra F, et al. Systematic review of appropriate cognitive assessment instruments used in clinical trials of schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. Psychiatr Res. 2014;216: 291–302

Bilder R, Ventura J, Reise S, Keefe R. Cognitive assessment interview (CAI) version 2, interviewer’s manual: Definitions and rating guidelines. UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute, Los Angeles. 2008.

Ventura J, Reise SP, Keefe RSE, Baade LE, Gold JM, Green MF, et al. The cognitive assessment interview (CAI): Development and validation of an empirically derived, brief interview-based measure of cognition. Schizophrenia Res. 2010;121:24–31

Ventura J, Bilder R, Reise S, Keefe R. CAI-cognitive assessment interview. Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles. 2010.

Ventura J, Reise SP, Keefe RSE, Hurford IM, Wood RC, Bilder RM. The cognitive assessment interview (CAI): Reliability and validity of a brief interview-based measure of cognition. Schizophrenia Bull. 2013;39: 583-91

Herdaetha A. Keefektifan terapi remediasi kognitif dengan bantuan komputer terhadap disfungsi kognitif pasien skizofrenia kronis di Panti Rehabilitasi Budi Makarti Boyolali [Thesis]. Solo: Universitas Sebelas Maret; 2009.

Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. Routledge, New York; 2011.

Purnama DA, Amir N, Budiman R, Heriani, Ariawan I. Uji validitas dan reliabilitas personal and social performance scale pada pasien skizofrenia di Indonesia. CDK 2012;39(2):98-101

Sastroasmoro S, Ismael S. Dasar-dasar metodologi penelitian klinis, 4th Ed. Jakarta: Sagung Seto; 2011

Salam R, Budiman R, Bastaman TK, Yuniar S, Damping C, Kusumawardhani A, et al. Pedoman definisi PANSS (positive and negative symptoms scale). Jakarta: Bagian Psikiatri, FK Universitas Indonesia; 1994.

Riwidikdo H. Statistik kesehatan dengan aplikasi SPSS dalam prosedur penelitian. Yogyakarta: Rohima Press; 2013.

Widoyoko EP. Teknik penyusunan instrumen penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar; 2012.

Bosgelmez S, Yildiz M, Yazici E, Inan E, Turgut C, Karabulut U, et al. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of cognitive assessment interview (CAI-TR). Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bulteni - Bull Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015;25(4):365-80

Sanchez-Torres AM, Elosúa MR, Lorente-Omenaca R, Moreno-Izco1 L, Peralta V, Ventura J, et al. Using the cognitive assessment interview to screen cognitive impairment in psychosis. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016;266(7):629-37.

Azwar S. Reliabilitas dan validitas. 4th Ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar; 2013

Downloads

Published

01-05-2019

How to Cite

Ardiningrum, W., Marchira, C. R., Kristanto, C. S., Ismanto, S. H., & Primawati, S. (2019). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Cognitive Assessment Interview versi Indonesia. Cermin Dunia Kedokteran, 46(5), 325–333. https://doi.org/10.55175/cdk.v46i5.458

Issue

Section

Articles