Nerve Reconstruction with Sural Nerve Graft in Low-Resource Setting
Case Report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55175/cdk.v52i10.1652Keywords:
Case report, low-resource setting, nerve reconstruction, schwannoma, sural nerve graftAbstract
Introduction: Nerve reconstruction is an essential procedure in the management of nerve damage. When end-to-end primary repair is not possible, an autologous nerve graft is the gold standard for management. The sural nerve is considered the most reliable harvest site. Compared to other reconstructive options, auto graft provides the best similar physiologic nerve environment for axonal regeneration. To achieve an efective neural regeneration, tension-free repair sites should be provided, as they hinder focal neural ischemia caused by disrupted microvascular fow. Case: A 52-year-old woman with a giant schwannoma of the ulnar nerve had a tumor excision surgery followed by sural nerve grafting in a low-resource setting where microsurgery equipment is unavailable. Maluku, with archipelago-type geography, poses signifcant challenges to healthcare professionals in performing guideline-based procedures. Conclusion: Considering the unavoidable risk of nerve damage and signifcant gap, tumor excision followed by nerve reconstruction using autograft was chosen in this case, resulting in a decent outcome.
Downloads
References
Dahlin LB, Wiberg M. Nerve injuries of the upper extremity and hand. EFORT Open Rev. 2017;2(5):158-70. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160071.
Beris A, Gkiatas I, Gelalis I, Papadopoulos D, Kostas-Agnantis I. Current concepts in peripheral nerve surgery. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019;29(2): 263-9. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2344-2.
Kornfeld T, Vogt PM, Radtke C. Nerve grafting for peripheral nerve injuries with extended defect sizes. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 2019;169(9):240-51. doi: 10.1007/s10354-018-0675-6.
Boyd KU, Nimigan AS, Mackinnon SE. Nerve reconstruction in the hand and upper extremity. Clin Plast Surg. 2011;38(4):643-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2011.07.008.
Ducic I, Yoon J, Buncke G. Chronic postoperative complications and donor site morbidity after sural nerve autograft harvest or biopsy. Microsurgery. 2020;40(6):710-6. doi: 10.1002/micr.30588.
Sachanandani NF, Pothula A, Tung TH. Nerve gaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(2):313-9. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000436856.55398.0f.
Grifn JW, Hogan MV, Chhabra AB, Deal DN. Peripheral nerve repair and reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(23):2144-51. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00704.
Matsuyama T, Mackay M, Midha R. Peripheral nerve repair and grafting techniques: a review. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2000;40(4):187-99. doi: 10.2176/nmc.40.187.
Rodriguez FJ, Folpe AL, Giannini C, Perry A. Pathology of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: diagnostic overview and update on selected diagnostic problems. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;123(3):295-319. doi: 10.1007/s00401-012-0954-z.
Ozdemir O, Ozsoy MH, Kurt C, Coskunol E, Calli I. Schwannomas of the hand and wrist: long-term results and review of the literature. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2005;13(3):267-72. doi: 10.1177/230949900501300309.
Li X, Zhong G, Xu X, Wang K, Zhu Y, Qi X, et al. Surgical strategies for peripheral nerve schwannoma based on the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Laparosc Endosc Robot Surg. 2019;2(3):65-9. doi:10.1016/j.lers.2019.06.001.
Piedra BIT, Fichman M. Sural nerve graft [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 [cited 21 Aug 2025]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557715/.
Lai CS, Chen IC, Lan HC, Lu CT, Yen JH, Song DY, et al. Management of extremity neurilemmomas: clinical series and literature review. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71 Suppl 1:S37-42. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000042.
Flores LP. Comparative study of nerve grafting versus distal nerve transfer for treatment of proximal injuries of the ulnar nerve. J Reconstruct Microsurg. 2015;31(9):647-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1556871.
Martins RS, Barbosa RA, Siqueira MG, Soares MS, Heise CO, Foroni L, et al. Morbidity following sural nerve harvesting: a prospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114(8):1149-52. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.02.045.
Hallgren A, Bjorkman A, Chemnitz A, Dahlin LB. Subjective outcome related to donor site morbidity after sural nerve graft harvesting: a survey in 41 patients. BMC Surg. 2013;13(1):39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-39.
Tada K, Nakada M, Matsuta M, Yamauchi D, Ikeda K, Tsuchiya H. Long-term outcomes of donor site morbidity after sural nerve graft harvesting. J Hand Surg Global Online. 2020;2(2):74-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2020.01.001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rabinda Fitriana Tuasikal, Rakha Sulthan Salim, Mo Tualeka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
