Sociodemographic Profiles of Pregnant Woman with Urinary Tract Infection: A Systematic Review of Current Research

Analysis

Authors

  • Fitriyadi Kusuma Departement of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo
  • Kemal Akbar Suryoadji Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia
  • Adib Kamil Putra Kadarusman Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia
  • Geraldus Sigap Gung Binathara Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University
  • Salsa Billa As’syifa Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia
  • Surahman Hakim Departement of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55175/cdk.v52i1.1250

Keywords:

Pregnant women, sociodemographic profiles, urinary tract infection

Abstract

Introduction: Untreated UTIs during pregnancy can lead to complications for both the mother and the fetus, highlighting the importance of appropriate management. Understanding the sociodemographic profiles of pregnant women with UTIs can aid in tailored interventions and care. Methods: This systematic review followed a protocol registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024507145). Cohort cross-sectional studies focusing on the sociodemographic profiles of pregnant women with UTI were systematically searched and selected from databases such as ScienceDirect, Cochrane, Scopus, and PubMed. Eligibility criteria included relevance to sociodemographic profiles, clear extraction and statistical analysis methods, and publication in English. Data extraction and study selection were conducted independently by six researchers, with any discrepancies resolved through discussion. Results: Three studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. The studies conducted in the United States, Cameroon, and Bangladesh, which included 46,398 pregnant women, revealed diverse sociodemographic factors associated with UTI risk among pregnant women. Factors such as low educational attainment, low household income, and racial/ethnic disparities were identified as significant contributors to UTI prevalence in the United States. In Cameroon, although a high UTI prevalence was observed, no significant risk factors were identified. In Bangladesh, maternal undernutrition, primiparity, and low paternal education were significant risk factors for UTIs among pregnant women. Antibiotic sensitivity was varied, indicating the complexity of UTI management. Conclusion: The systematic review emphasizes the importance of considering sociodemographic factors in understanding and addressing UTI risk among pregnant women. Socioeconomic status, cultural disparities, and health-related factors play significant roles in UTI prevalence and management. An intervention to target specific sociodemographic characteristics may be necessary to effectively prevent and manage UTIs in pregnant women across different geographical and socioeconomic contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Storme O, Tiran Saucedo J, Garcia-Mora A, Dehesa-Davila M, Naber KG. Risk factors and predisposing conditions for urinary tract infection. Ther Adv Urol 2019;11:175628721881438. DOI: 10.1177/1756287218814382.

Ghouri F, Hollywood A, Ryan K. Urinary tract infections and antibiotic use in pregnancy - qualitative analysis of online forum content. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):289. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2451-z.

Habak PJ. Urinary tract infection in pregnancy. U.S. National Library of Medicine [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Feb 24]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537047/.

Matuszkiewicz-Rowinska J, Małyszko J, Wieliczko M. Urinary tract infections in pregnancy: Old and new unresolved diagnostic and therapeutic problems. Arch Med Sci. 2015;11:67–77. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2013.39202.

Pastore LM, Savitz DA, Thorp JMJ, Koch GG, Hertz-Picciotto I, Irwin DE. Predictors of symptomatic urinary tract infection after 20 weeks’ gestation. J Perinatol. 1999;19:488–93. DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200264.

Johnson CY, Rocheleau CM, Howley MM, Chiu SK, Arnold KE, Ailes EC. Characteristics of women with urinary tract infection in pregnancy. J Women’s Health. 2021;30(11):1556–64. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8946.

Ngong IN, Fru-Cho J, Yung MA, Akoachere J-FK. Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern and associated risk factors for urinary tract infections in pregnant women attending ANC in some integrated health centers in the Buea Health District. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):673. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04142-4.

Lee AC, Mullany LC, Koffi AK, Rafiqullah I, Khanam R, Folger LV, et al. Urinary tract infections in pregnancy in a rural population of Bangladesh:

Population-based prevalence, risk factors, etiology, and antibiotic resistance. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;20(1):1. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04142-4.

Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment form for cohort studies [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK115843/bin/appe-fm3.pdf.

Jansaker F, Li X, Sundquist K. Sociodemographic factors and uncomplicated cystitis in women aged 15-50 years: A nationwide Swedish cohort registry study (1997-2018). Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021;4:100108. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100108.

Hooja N, Aseri S. Evaluation of socio-demographic risk factors for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. Internat J Pregnancy Child Birth. 2022;8(1):21-3. DOI: 10.15406/ipcb.2022.08.00255.

Cooper E, Read B, Sanyaolu L, Ahmed H, Lecky D. Impact of sociodemographic status and UTI symptoms on women’s health-care seeking and management in England: findings from an e-survey conducted during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. BJGP Open. 2023;7(4):1-13. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0039.

Graseck A, Thompson J, Bryant A. Urinary tract infections in pregnant individuals. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee [Internet]. 2023 Aug. Available from: https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/clinical-consensus/articles/2023/08/urinarytract-infections-in-pregnant-individuals.

Kazemier BM, Koningstein FN, Schneeberger C, Ott A, Bossuyt PM, de Miranda E, et al. Maternal and neonatal consequences of treated and untreated asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy: A prospective cohort study with an embedded randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:1324–33.

Langermans LM, Cools W, Van Limbergen I, Gucciardo L, Faron G. Optimal timing to screen for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy: First s second trimester. J Perinat Med. 2021;49:539–45. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0322.

O’Leary BD, Armstrong FM, Byrne S, Talento AF, O’Coigligh S. The prevalence of positive urine dipstick testing and urine culture in the asymptomatic pregnant woman: A cross-sectional study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;253:103–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.004.

Wang T, Wu G, Wang J, Cui Y, Ma J, Zhu Z, et al. Comparison of single-dose fosfomycin tromethamine and other antibiotics for lower uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women and asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2020;56:106018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106018.

Emami A, Javanmardi F, Pirbonyeh N. Antibiotic resistant profile of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020;18:807– 15. DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1759420.

Glaser AP, Schaeffer AJ. Urinary tract infection and bacteriuria in pregnancy. Urol Clin North Am. 2015;42:547–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2015.05.004.

Schulz GS, Schutz F, Spielmann FV, da Ros LU, de Almeida JS, Ramos JG. Single-dose antibiotic therapy for urinary infections during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;159:56–64. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14087.

Downloads

Published

13-01-2025

How to Cite

Kusuma, F., Suryoadji, K. A., Kadarusman, A. K. P., Binathara, G. S. G., As’syifa, S. B., & Hakim, S. (2025). Sociodemographic Profiles of Pregnant Woman with Urinary Tract Infection: A Systematic Review of Current Research: Analysis. Cermin Dunia Kedokteran, 52(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.55175/cdk.v52i1.1250